Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  50 / 116 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 50 / 116 Next Page
Page Background

Physical Fitness for Diving

RESEARCH, EDUCATION & MEDICINE

EXPERT OPINIONS

48

|

SPRING 2016

By Neal W. Pollock, Ph.D.

T

he physical fitness requirements

for diving depend on a number of

factors. While this makes establishing

a single standard challenging, it can

also lead to interesting discussion.

At the most basic level, divers need

to be able to easily meet the normal demands of diving

with a fitness reserve sufficient to meet the additional

demands of emergency situations. Environmental

conditions dramatically influence “normal demands.” Calm,

warm tropical waters are generally much less taxing than

colder water. The demands increase as equipment, sea

state, and entry and exit conditions intensify.

Diver skill also plays an important role in determining

the demands of a dive. A diver with excellent buoyancy

control wearing minimum ballast weight will work far less

than a diver fighting improper weighting or having less

refined buoyancy control.

Similar issues exist in

establishing reasonable

physical fitness buffers to

handle emergency demands.

Environmental conditions,

equipment worn, proximity

to a safe exit, available

surface support and even

the buddy’s physical fitness,

size and skill have influence.

While the highest level of

physical fitness is desired,

a practical approach

is to consider minimal

competencies.

HOW TO EVALUATE

PHYSICAL FITNESS

A review of health history may be sufficient for healthy,

active individuals. Functional fitness tests help ensure

that a person is fit for diving. These can often be

conducted in a pool or in open water. Lab-based tests

of physical capacity may be appropriate in the case of a

poor history of physical activity, concerns about safety

during performance tests, or the presence of potential

medical issues.

FUNCTIONAL FITNESS TESTING

Functional fitness testing has natural relevance to

real-world activity. One simple series was proposed to

evaluate recreational divers.

1

Divers would demonstrate

the following capabilities: 1) lift and carry individual

items of diving equipment on land; 2) stand from sitting

and walk 100 feet in standard scuba equipment; 3)

ascend a 5-foot vertical ladder from the water wearing

standard scuba equipment; and 4) swim underwater at

0.5 knot for 30 minutes and at 1.2 knots for 3 minutes

wearing standard scuba gear.

Another approach was proposed for scientific divers,

focusing on rescue capabilities.

2

Evaluations followed

a normal dive to start with typical fatigue levels. Since

open-water environments are not available year-round

in all places, a pool modification was also provided.

The details can be seen in Table 1.

Table 1. Proposed physical fitness test for scientific divers to be completed

in continuous sequence

Open-Water Testing Scenario*

Pool Modifications**

219-yard (200 m) surface swim in

full gear

328-yard (300 m) surface swim (full gear,

no suit)

109-yard (100 m) rescue tow (both in

full gear)

220-yard (200 m) rescue tow (full gear,

no suit)

Beach/dock/boat removal of victim Poolside removal of victim with both victim

and rescuer wearing 15-pound (7 kg)

weight belts

Basic life-support simulation

Same

35 (male) / 25 (female) military-style

push-ups

Same

* immediately following a working dive

** immediately following underwater skill drills

CORKY WAGNER