Previous Page  63 / 116 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 63 / 116 Next Page
Page Background

gain experience by simulating (within the scope of

their training) and managing realistic emergencies in

confined water. Another instructor and explorer,

Phil Short, said, “I do it when I don’t have to, so I can

when I do.”

DIVING PROVIDES EXPERIENCE.

Diving provides experience that’s hard to get though

instruction (this is what we really mean when we say

there’s no substitute for experience). By going diving

we subconsciously learn normal patterns — how things

are supposed to be and what we are supposed to do in

different circumstances and underwater environments.

When something violates our subconscious

expectations, we go on alert, sometimes reacting

intuitively even before a problem occurs.

There are numerous examples of this intuition

in different endeavors. One example documented

by cognitive psychologist Gary Klein, who is one

of the primary researchers in this area, involved an

experienced firefighter who led a crew into a house to

fight what seemed to be a routine kitchen fire. They

sprayed the fire, but it almost immediately roared back

to life. Uneasy, the commander ordered his crew out.

Moments later the floor collapsed as a huge undetected

fire in the basement engulfed the structure; everyone

would have died if they had stayed in the house.

Right after a close call, those involved often say they

didn’t know how they knew something was wrong, they

just did. Deeper analysis commonly finds multiple subtle

pattern deviations that even trained people may not have

noticed consciously, but their subconscious apparently

did. The lead firefighter said he saw no threat, but he

somehow knew something was terribly wrong. Later

examination found that besides the fire roaring back to

life, the room was much hotter than it should have been,

and the men reported it was unusually quiet (the hidden

fire was muffled in the basement). Unconsciously, these

pattern mismatches warned the commander.

Experience will keep us out of trouble — if we allow

it to. In other words, if something doesn’t feel right

when diving, don’t wait to find out why. Trust your

intuition, and act accordingly.

NOT ALL EXPERIENCE IS HELPFUL.

It’s not just the quantity but also the quality of experience

that counts. We need enough repetitive experience to

learn patterns, but beyond a certain point, more doesn’t

benefit us.

Consider two divers, one with 1,000 dives and one

with 200 dives. The first is an open-water diver who has

made all 1,000 dives on about a dozen shallow tropical

coral reefs, all from a boat in a wetsuit and wearing an

aluminum 80 cubic foot cylinder. The second diver has

about 50 dives on similar reefs, plus 40 dives in kelp, 20

dives in a cold-water reservoir, 15 dives in a river, 20

dives on Atlantic wrecks, 25 in Florida’s springs and the

rest in inland quarries and off Florida’s gulf coast. The

second diver is certified as an advanced open-water

diver, cavern diver, rebreather diver and drysuit diver

and has dived from boats and shore, including through

surf. Which diver has the most useful experience that

will help reduce risk, especially when visiting a new

environment for the first time?

There’s nothing wrong with making a dive you like for

the umpteen-billionth time, but be realistic about how

much it is or is not contributing to your experience.

EXPERIENCE CAN INCREASE RISK.

Be cautious of normalization of deviance, which can

be summed up as getting used to not following your

training because nothing bad happens. If someone

violates safe diving practices (e.g., exceeds training

limits, omits standard gear, skips checklists, etc.) and

nothing goes wrong, there’s greater likelihood the

person will violate these practices again. Experience

makes this worse, because repetition without

negative consequences makes the safe practices that

were omitted seem unnecessary, until the deviation

becomes the new normal practice. Researchers cite

normalization of deviance as primary factors in the loss

of the

Challenger

and the Chernobyl nuclear disaster.

Culture can magnify normalization by failing to

correct the deviation or even encouraging it (“Oh, you

had to do that in training, but no one really does it.”).

Normalization of deviance is particularly common

in endeavors such as scuba diving that tend to have

redundant safety practices to account for unintended

and random human error. Nothing goes wrong because

a redundancy accounts for the deviation — until one

day the redundant factor is accidentally omitted, too.

If you find yourself skipping things you learned to do

in training (such as predive safety checks), exceeding

limits (diving deeper than you were trained to or

entering overhead environments without training) or

omitting gear you were trained to always have (such as

snorkels or surface signaling devices), you’re exhibiting

normalization of deviance. If you and your buddies

reinforce these behaviors, you’re in a microculture that

is normalizing deviation.

Because experience can reinforce normalization of

deviance, experience is only a cure if something bad

happens due to the deviation (and even then some divers

go right back to the unsafe practices). The cure and

prevention are the self-discipline to follow your training,

honesty about the safety of your diving behaviors and

refusal to listen to other (sometimes more experienced)

divers who encourage deviations.

AD

ALERTDIVER.COM

|

61